global challenges logo global challenges logo
  • Global Governance
    • What is Global Governance?
    • New Shape Library
    • Global Governance reform proposals
  • Global Risks
    • Introduction to Global Risks
    • Climate change
    • Weapons of mass destruction
    • Ecological collapse
    • Other risks
      • Artificial intelligence
      • Asteroid impact
      • Pandemics
      • Supervolcanic eruption
      • Future risks
  • Initiatives
    • Analysis & research 
      • Reports
      • Surveys
      • Research calls
      • Podcasts
    • Partnerships
      • Climate Governance Commission
      • Global Resilience Council
      • The Earth Commission
      • Global Governance Forum
      • Together First
      • The Stimson Center
    • Education
      • Global Challenges program at Stockholm School of Economics
      • How is it governed?
    • Events
  • About
    • The Global Challenges Foundation
      • In memory of our founder
      • History
      • Our View
      • Organisation
      • Newsroom
    • Updates
    • In the media
info@globalchallenges.org

Divestment: a financial tool for risk reduction

Ariel Conn, Future of Life Institute, Denver, USA

2 minutes read

August 30, 2016

Can we harness market mechanisms to reduce risk? When companies favor short-term gains at the expense of long-term safety, divestment offers concerned citizens a tool of action. Beyond their direct effects, divestment campaigns can impact corporate behaviour through media pressure. Aside from ethical considerations, divestment can also make good business sense. Companies that take sustainability seriously tend to do better in the long-term, as reflected in the success of recent divestment initiatives by Swedish pension funds.

The greatest risks facing the world today are almost entirely manmade. In fact, when it comes to two of the greatest threats – climate change and nuclear weapons – some companies are actively and even intentionally exacerbating the problem, simply because it improves their short-term bottom line and share-holder value. This near-sighted approach is dangerous for humankind. But it also allows more ethically-inclined individuals and institutions to take meaningful action in defense of our future: they can divest.

Divestment for social good gained popularity in the 1980s, as people and companies divested from South Africa to fight apartheid. Tobacco companies suffered a similar fate. More recently divestment campaigns have cropped up against child labor, fossil fuels, and nuclear weapons. While there is little evidence that divestment hurts a company’s share price, there is broad agreement that stigmatization can draw greater media attention to a company’s role in a problem, damaging their public image.

In response to a divestment campaign against them, Lockheed Martin announced in 2013 that they would cease all involvement in the creation of cluster munitions. Investors are hoping for a similar response to campaigns dedicated to sustainability and decreasing the risks of nuclear weapons.


“Only a few large organisations or institutions need to divest from companies with questionable priorities, and the resulting media attention can have a snowball effect”

This year, the Future of Life Institute (FLI) launched its own US-based nuclear weapons divestment campaign, based off of the successful European campaign, Don’t Bank on the Bomb. FLI worked with the City of Cambridge in Massachusetts to help the city divest their $1 billion pension fund from companies that create nuclear weapons or parts for nuclear weapons. As part of their effort to bring public attention to the idea of nuclear divestment, they also worked with MinutePhysics to create a humorous video about the dangers of nuclear weapons, and they’ve built version 1.0 of a nuclear divestment web app.

In a Huffington Post article, Susi Snyder, who led the Don’t Bank on the Bomb campaign, said, “Public exclusions by investors have a stigmatizing effect on companies associated with illegitimate activities. […] While it is unlikely that divestment by a single financial institution or government would be enough for a company to cancel its nuclear weapons associated contracts, divestment by even a few institutions, or countries, for the same reason can affect a company’s strategic direction.”

Mats Andersson, new vice-chairman of the Global Challenges Foundation, also has a strong history of divestment for social good. As CEO of Swedish pension fund AP4, Andersson pursued sustainable and socially conscious investments, while nearly doubling the size of the company’s funds. He’s argued that carbon divestment doesn’t just make sense from an environmental perspective, but it also makes good business sense. Companies that take long-term issues like sustainability seriously are more likely to take their business seriously. Such companies will likely prove better investments over time.

As Andersson said in the Chief Investment Officer, “Climate change investing is not about charity or good public relations, it’s about dealing with risks. If you do that properly you will enhance your returns in the long term.”

The world is financially driven, and divestment offers socially-conscious shareholders a means of influencing a company’s actions for the good of humankind. Only a few large organisations or institutions need to divest from companies with questionable priorities, and the resulting media attention can have a snowball effect, influencing more and more organisations to follow suit. Divestment is a great tool for individuals and organisations to fight for social good.

Risk Expert

Ariel Conn

Ariel Conn oversees digital media and communications at the Future of Life Institute (FLI). She’s...

Read more Show less

Related content

Global catastrophic risk: whose problem is it anyway?

Who is ultimately responsible for global catastrophic risk? For nuclear war, the UN Security Council is the clear...

Planetary stewardship in the Anthropocene

As human impact on the planet’s environment reaches unprecedented scale, what leverage points exist for transformative change in...

Global Challenges Foundation joins forces with The Earth League

Earth League, with the support of Global Challenges Foundation, launches the climate petition Earth Statement. T The petition...

Global
Challenges
Foundation

Sign up for our newsletter here!

    Global Challenges Foundation

    The Global Challenges Foundation works to raise awareness of global catastrophic risks and to strengthen global governance to handle them.

     

    Publisher: Jens Orback.

    Address

    Grev Turegatan 30, 114 38 Stockholm, Sweden

    Contact

    • info@globalchallenges.org

    Data Protection Policy & cookies

    © 2023 Global Challenges Foundation. All Rights Reserved.

    The Global Challenges Foundation works to raise awareness of global catastrophic risks and to strengthen global governance to handle them.

     

    Publisher: Jens Orback.

    Address:

    Grev Turegatan 30, 114 38 Stockholm, Sweden

    Contact:

    • info@globalchallenges.org

    Sign up for our newsletter here!

      Data Protection Policy & cookies

      © 2023 Global Challenges Foundation. All Rights Reserved.

      We use cookies to improve your user experience. For more information on how we handle your data, see our Integrity policy

      I consent